Re: New acinclude.m4
| От | Adam H. Pendleton |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: New acinclude.m4 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | F2401280-20F2-4EAC-A0F6-BAFF7680C6B3@fmonkey.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: New acinclude.m4 (Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz@club-internet.fr>) |
| Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On May 19, 2005, at 4:54 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote: > What I'm trying to say is this: > I've a dynamic only build. So, wx-config --libs is ok. wx-config > --static --libs gives an error. > According to what I understand from the wx-config --help output is: > if I had both built and would like to get informations concerning the > static wxWid libs, then I'd need to pass --static to wx-config. Right? Yes. The --static flag is only useful in the case where a user has both a static and dynamic build of wxWidgets in the same tree. > > yup, _I HATE STATIC BUILDS TOO_ :)) But, it seems that at least for > Florian this is important. The latest patch I sent just does two > things: > a) force static parameters of wxWid, just in case the wx-config --libs > would not give the _static_ lib informations when both shared and > static > are installed on the system. Yes, your patch would add support for those people with both build types. > b) re-introduce the pg_static_build=yes variable which is later > interpreted just as in previous versions because the old code is still > there. There are no references to pg_static_build in acinclude any more. Well, okay there's one, but it doesn't do anything because pg_static_build isn't set anywhere (sans your patch, of course). Your patch is fine, just know that it terms of statically linking pgAdmin3 as a whole it does nothing. It only helps any user with both a dynamic and static wx select the one they want. ahp
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: