Re: Version Numbering
От | Devrim GÜNDÜZ |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Version Numbering |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F0A12B86-DF22-45D9-A0E0-B42B7176EB3C@gunduz.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Version Numbering (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Version Numbering
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
+1 for Tom's post. -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ PostgreSQL DBA @ Akinon/Markafoni, Red Hat Certified Engineer devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz 20.Ağu.2010 tarihinde 21:40 saatinde, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> şunları yazdı: > "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes: >> A while ago, I asked if .0 releases could be versioned with three >> digits instead of two. That is, it would be "8.4.0" instead of "8.4". > > We've been doing that for some time, no? A quick look at the CVS > history shows that 8.0.0 and up were tagged that way. > >> This is to make the format consistent with maintenance releases >> ("8.4.1", etc.). I thought this was generally agreed upon, but >> maybe not, because I just went to build the latest 9.0 beta and saw >> that the version number is "9.0beta4". > > .0 is for releases, not betas. I see no need for an extra number in > beta versions. > > regards, tom lane > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: