Re: [GENERAL] Using views and MS access via odbc
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Using views and MS access via odbc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJOEEHHLAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Using views and MS access via odbc (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Using views and MS access via odbc
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > > "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: > > If you'd not like to change the behavior, I would change it, OK ? > > To what? I don't want to simply undo the 7.2 change. What I'm thinking is the following makeshift fix. I expect it solves Ron's case though I'm not sure. Returning UPDATE 0 seem to make no one happy. regards, Hiroshi Inoue *** postgres.c.orig Thu Feb 28 08:17:01 2002 --- postgres.c Sat May 4 22:53:03 2002 *************** *** 805,811 **** if (DebugLvl > 1) elog(DEBUG, "ProcessQuery"); ! if (querytree->originalQuery) { /* original stmt can override default tag string */ ProcessQuery(querytree, plan, dest, completionTag); --- 805,811 ---- if (DebugLvl > 1) elog(DEBUG, "ProcessQuery"); ! if (querytree->originalQuery || length(querytree_list) == 1) { /* original stmt can override default tag string */ ProcessQuery(querytree, plan, dest, completionTag);
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: