> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane
>
> Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com> writes:
> > Could we get out of this by defining that "timeout" is
> > automatically reset at next statement end?
>
> I was hoping to avoid that, because it seems like a wart. OTOH,
> it'd be less of a wart than the global changes of semantics that
> Bruce is proposing :-(
Probably I'm misunderstanding this thread.
Why must the query_timeout be reset particularly ?
What's wrong with simply issueing set query_timeout
command just before every query ?
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue