RE: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM?
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJIEBMEMAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM? ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Hiroshi Inoue > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tom Lane > > > > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > > I've been staring at the lock names for an hour now and the > > best name I've > > > come up with is SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE, as in "share update, otherwise > > > exclusive" (the implication being that update would allow > > select as well), > > > or some permutation thereof. > > > > Okay with me, unless someone else comes up with a better idea... > > > > I have no better idea but I hope to leave VacuumLock as an alias > because I can't remember others. > Isn't it a better idea to have a separate 'SELF EXCLUSIVE' lock which conflicts with only itself ? regards, HIroshi Inoue
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: