RE: ODBC backward versions
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | RE: ODBC backward versions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJIEBLDJAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | ODBC backward versions (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: ODBC backward versions
Re: ODBC backward versions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Momjian > Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 11:01 AM > To: PostgreSQL-development > Subject: [HACKERS] ODBC backward versions > > > I checked the logs, and we released the new 6.4 backend protocol on > 1998-10-30. That was 2.5 years ago. > > We normally allow older clients to communicate with newer servers, but > often we don't support newer clients talking to older servers, sometimes > even servers one release in the past. The reason is that the backend > communication code gets confusing. For example, I know there were some > libpq releases that could not talk to servers from the previous release. Libpq 2.x couldn't talk to pre-6.4 servers. Fortunately ODBC has never used libpq and could talk to wide range of versions. Should ODBC throw away the luck ? > We did allow newer servers to talk to older clients because it is harder > to upgrade many clients than a single server. > > Seems the <=6.3 compatibility code in our current ODBC is just adding > confusion for coders and users and should be removed. Tom Lane agreed. > Where's real coders for psqlodbc driver in the first place ? Byron has been unavailable for a long time and I've seen few improvements for a year or so. Does removing pre-6.4 code improve the status ? The problem is that there has been no maintainer of odbc driver. Regards, Hiroshi Inoue
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: