Re: Problems about ODBC3 datetime
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problems about ODBC3 datetime |
Дата | |
Msg-id | EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJAEMPJMAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Problems about ODBC3 datetime ("Han" <zhouhanok@vip.sina.com>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Han > > Hi, > Firstly, I encountered a problem when using SQL_DATE: when > I use SQLGetTypeInfo(...,SQL_DATE); > the API returns no record. I debuged the psqlodbc driver and > found that the value of the parameter DataType was 91. So I think > that the value was changed by the odbc30 Driver Manager. But why > don't the psqlodbc add the SQL_TYPE_DATE and other ODBC30 data > types support in the array sqlTypes[](in pgtypes.c)? Hmm you seem to be right. I would add SQL_TYPE_DATE, SQL_TYPE_TIME and SQL_TYPE_TIMESTAMP to sqlTypes[]. > Secondly, I wander why returning SQL_DATETIME in function > pgtype_to_sqldesctype for the three types--SQL_TYPE_DATE, > SQL_TYPE_TIME, SQL_TYPE_TIMESTAMP? There are SQL_DESC_TYPE and SQL_DESC_CONCISE_TYPE in ODBC3 and If SQL_DESC_CONCISE_TYPE is set to a concise data type other than an interval or datetime data type, the SQL_DESC_TYPE field is set to the same value and the SQL_DESC_DATETIME_INTERVAL_CODE field is set to 0. If SQL_DESC_CONCISE_TYPE is set to the concise datetime or interval data type, the SQL_DESC_TYPE field is set to the corresponding verbose type (SQL_DATETIME or SQL_INTERVAL) and the SQL_DESC_DATETIME_INTER VAL_CODE field is set to the appropriate subcode. regards, Hiroshi Inoue
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: