Re: GUC with units, details
От | Michael Glaesemann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GUC with units, details |
Дата | |
Msg-id | EFAD1510-9D00-4E9A-B18B-51100379C97B@seespotcode.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GUC with units, details (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: GUC with units, details
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 27, 2006, at 6:10 , Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > The thing is, most memory sizes in postgres need to be some > multiple of > a page size. You can't have a shared buffers of exactly 100000 bytes, > while 102400 bytes is possible. I've seen this mentioned a couple of times. I'm not nearly as familiar with these settings as I should be, but it seems to me that if the memory size *does* need to be a integral multiple of page size, e.g., n * page_size = memory_size, why isn't that memory configured as the integer n rather than memory_size? Wouldn't this get around the issue altogether? Granted, this is a larger change than allowing units for the values, which I think is a good thing. But it is perhaps shows more clearly the relationship between the different values in postgresql.conf and prevents setting memory sizes that *aren't* multiples of page size. Michael Glaesemann grzm seespotcode net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: