Re: Getting information about sequences
От | Gavin M. Roy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Getting information about sequences |
Дата | |
Msg-id | EDBDE3E1-A5A0-4B27-A05B-851724532BF7@ehpg.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FW: Getting information about sequences ("Forums @ Existanze" <forums@existanze.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Do you mean every version of OS X? I will not run on OS 9, afaik. It can be compiled against any version of OS X, again as far as I know. Gavin On May 16, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Forums @ Existanze wrote: > Here is the thing, the user doesn't have Postgres installed on his/her > computer. So how am I going to distribute pg_dump, from my > understandin you > have to compile postgres on a Mac in order to get the pgdump > executable. And > is this for every version of Mac? > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Martijn van Oosterhout [mailto:kleptog@svana.org] >> Sent: 16 May 2006 17:46 >> To: Forums @ Existanze >> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org >> Subject: Re: FW: [GENERAL] Getting information about sequences >> >> pg_dump runs on any platform postgres does. >> >> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 05:31:44PM +0300, Forums @ Existanze wrote: >>> Does pg_dump run in Macintosh? >>> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] >>>> Sent: 16 May 2006 17:22 >>>> To: Forums @ Existanze >>>> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org >>>> Subject: Re: FW: [GENERAL] Getting information about sequences >>>> >>>> "Forums @ Existanze" <forums@existanze.com> writes: >>>>> We are creating a jdbc backup solution that does NOT >> require the >>>>> pgdump program. >>>> >>>> In heaven's name, WHY? >>>> >>>> Do you have any idea how much future pain you are setting >> yourself >>>> up for? pg_dump changes with every PG release to deal with new >>>> features and changes in the system catalogs. >>>> Read the CVS logs for pg_dump for the past few years, then ask >>>> yourself if you really want to buy into a comparable amount of >>>> ongoing maintenance effort. >>>> >>>> You'd be way better off just invoking pg_dump as a >> subprocess. If >>>> there are specific features you need that pg_dump doesn't >> have (eg, >>>> dumping just selected tables) consider helping to add them. >>>> >>>> regards, tom lane >>>> >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------(end of >>> broadcast)--------------------------- >>> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate >>> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org >> so that your >>> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >> >> -- >> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> >> http://svana.org/kleptog/ >>> From each according to his ability. To each according to >> his ability to litigate. >> > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: