Re: Overhauling GUCS
От | David E. Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ED198E85-983C-4B54-8F1A-592A2528FAA5@kineticode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Overhauling GUCS (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Overhauling GUCS
Re: Overhauling GUCS |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jun 4, 2008, at 11:22, Tom Lane wrote: > "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes: >> Exactly. The issue is that application developers, who are not DBAs, >> have no idea how to tune PostgreSQL, and postgresql.conf is daunting >> and confusing. So they use a different database that's "faster". > > I take it you haven't looked at mysql's configuration file lately. I'm not much into MySQL, but in the work I've done with it, I've had to create /etc/my.cnf myself. There *is* no configuration file configuring MySQL until that file is created, is there? So there is no configuration to learn at first. I'm not saying that this is necessarily admirable -- it's kind of the opposite end of the spectrum (PostgreSQL: "Here is every configuration tweak you could ever possibly want, have fun!" vs MySQL: "There is no configuration until you need one, then you have to find the docs for it." > They aren't actually in any better shape than we are, except that > they supply several "preconfigured" sample files for people to choose > from. Which would be a good start, if nothing else… Best, David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: