Re: PostgreSQL License
| От | Rob Sargent |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL License |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | ECA73140-50F2-4C1D-A597-45CC5B5E6BB4@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL License (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
That was my thought actually. By legitimate I meant in good conscience as opposed to any comment on the legalityOn 9/18/19 6:03 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:Charging for installing PostgreSQL is not the same as charging for PostgreSQL.
Bottom line: you charge for services you provide not for software that other people provide.That's just really not true. There is nothing that prohibits you from selling Postgresql. I mean, it's not a great business model because you can get it for free, but there's nothing that stops you from doing it.
Quoting Adrian Klaver in this thread from about eight hours ago: "You cannot (legitimately) charge the pharmacist for any part PostgresQL."
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: