Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era?
От | Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | EC55DC235432104F8255702A8D7344D925702A44@G9W0741.americas.hpqcorp.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? (Marc Cousin <cousinmarc@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era?
Re: Hope for a new PostgreSQL era? |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Marc Cousin <cousinmarc@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > I wish it was the same (I use and like both pgbouncer and pgpool too, > and they do a good job, I'm not arguing on that). But unfortunately it > isn't: you still have the notion of session for each connected client > in Oracle when using the shared servers model. > > It means you keep your session variables, your prepared statements, > your running transaction, etc… in each individual session while having > the multiplexing equivalent of a 'statement level' from pgbouncer. In Oracle - can the pool share connections between DB users and/or databases on the instance? If the answer is yes to either,that is a fair bit better than what we can achieve today. Brad.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: