Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day?
От | Jonathan S. Katz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | EC253C29-9992-4865-AED8-E2A9150F6B26@excoventures.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day? (Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@2ndQuadrant.it>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Oct 25, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@2ndQuadrant.it> wrote: > Hi Josh, > > Il 25/10/12 14:31, Josh Berkus ha scritto: >> It's not helpful if the exceptions make our numbers look smaller than MySQL's ... > I have no idea about the numbers we already have, so I don't know if that's below MySQL. > > But I would simply take them for what they are: download hits from the PostgreSQL community website. If we are afraid ofthe absolute numbers, I think it is important also to monitor the trend. > > I would not mind - if possible - an automated process that every day aggregates this data based (just making it up) onUTC. Then publish this data on the website somewhere. > > I volunteer to help with this process, if it does not exist yet. > > Cheers, > Gabriele +1. Particularly to look at the trends and see where we are increasing/decreasing on downloads. We can also try to identifyany correlation with other marketing efforts and see, for instance, if press coverage or other mentions are in factdriving more downloads. Jonathan
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: