Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature.
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | EBC6E556-0E98-41C9-ACE1-5B9CB638AF4D@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Add documentation for the JIT feature.
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On March 31, 2018 8:43:37 AM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 3/29/18 14:43, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I'm *not* OK with expanding the scope of "make check" >to include building the documentation. It's never had anything to do >with docs before and I see no reason to start now. Personally, when >I'm working on a patch, the doc updates if any are a completely >separate >matter. I don't want to waste cycles on testing docs when I'm trying >to test code, any more than I would like the reverse (ie forcing a docs >build to build code too). They're a local check target in the docs directory. But it just checks postgres.xml, not additional targets. Don't thinkanybody proposed to add the doc check to the top-level check target. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: