Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
| От | David E. Wheeler |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | EB604FD0-A3B1-488D-8806-7B6D98831852@kineticode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 13, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I sure would like it if the install script with no version in it corresponded to the latest version. Otherwise, one mustrename the file every time one does a release. And as you're noting, you lose Git history that way. > > (1) git does know it's a rename, it's just not default for git diff to > show it that way. I see, looks like one can `git diff --follow` to see it that way: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2314652/ > (2) I think that the normal use-case would not involve removing the old > file, so this is moot anyhow. Oh. So one normally will ship, for an extension "foo", only "foo.sql" and any necssary upgrade scripts? Best, David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: