Re: Git is not an acronym
От | Daniel Gustafsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Git is not an acronym |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E9BC6FA6-A62D-4E4F-9799-41AB1EE2F135@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Git is not an acronym ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Git is not an acronym
Re: Git is not an acronym |
Список | pgsql-docs |
> On 10 Jun 2021, at 15:03, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote: > > On 6/10/21 7:40 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> Commit 651377933e031 cleaned up references to CVS replacing them with Git. >> Replacing CVS with Git in acronyms.sgml seems a bit incorrect though as Git >> isn't an acronym (but CVS is, hence the original item replaced). We also never >> refer to Git with <acronym /> tags. The attached removes Git from the acronyms >> page. > > According to the README[1] and reference in the Wikipedia page that our > docs point too, "git" can be an acronym based on context. I don't think > it's harmful to leave it in. Not harmful, but an acronym which we explain with the acronym itself doesn't seem like helpful use of page real-estate. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: