Re: extension_control_path
От | David E. Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: extension_control_path |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E987852F-C2E1-4E8A-8353-23061C3A9D2E@justatheory.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: extension_control_path (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 6, 2014, at 9:14 AM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote: > Installing into /usr/local is a global system change. Only root should > be able to do that and any user that can do that can easily acquire > root privileges. I agree with you, but I don’t think the Homebrew folks do. Or at least their current implementation doesn’t. OT though. > Well, users can do whatever they want at run-time but there are > blessed paths that are the correct place to install things that these > systems are configured to search automatically. My point was just that > there are generally two such blessed paths, one for the distribution > and one for the local sysadmin. Yeah, two blessed would be very useful, but I think the ability to add any number of paths would be even better. > What you do not want is to have a different path for each piece of > software. That way lies the > /usr/local/kde/bin:/usr/local/gnome/bin:/usr/local/myfavouritehack/bin:... > madness. You can do this with Python or Perl but they won't do it > automatically and everyone who does this with environment variables or > command line flags eventually realizes what a mess it is. (Except Java > programmers) Agreed. Best, David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: