Re: [GENERAL] Map of Postgresql Users (OT)

Well, we certainly do not want to do anything against the law. What
countries would these be?

On Dec 7, 2005, at 9:38 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> It is an issue with the law in several countries. The two sets of
> information may be public, but the combined info is still sensitive.
> It's law, it doesn't have to make sense :-) I'm not sure if it applies
> exactly in this case, but it could very well do, and it's just
> unnecessary to risk stepping on it.
>
>
> It's a different thing if we have people who want to be listed by name
> register on a webpage. Then they volounteer the combined information,
> and it's perfectly ok to use it that way (especially since we'd say
> that's why).
>
> //Magnus
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match