Re: Library names on Unix
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Library names on Unix |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7ED7C@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Library names on Unix (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] > Sent: 04 January 2006 14:12 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [ODBC] Library names on Unix > > As far as consistency goes, this behavior is consistent with other > PostgreSQL-using packages (that I have had a hand in), e.g., > libpqxx. And inconsistent with other PostgreSQL-using packages that I have a hand in, e.g., pgAdmin :-) > While > the dichotomy between options and variables is certainly not > comprehensible > to the casual user, I'd hesitate to make up new stuff for the > purpose of > spelling things differently. As long as it's documented, it > should be OK. It seems to me it's not just a case of spelling things differently - it's doing things the way users expect. I've *never* come across a configure script that required me to set options via the environment rather than a --with-foo= style option. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: