Re: Library names on Unix
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Library names on Unix |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7ECD2@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Library names on Unix (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Library names on Unix
Re: Library names on Unix |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut > Sent: 02 January 2006 16:30 > To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > Subject: [ODBC] Library names on Unix > > Maybe one could discuss whether the -a or the -w > variant provides the > most faithful backward compatibility, but I tend to think > that users are > perhaps better served if they are forced to stop and decide > with which > variant they want to proceed. Ideas? Agreed. That was the approach I took on Windows - rename 'em both and force users to decide which one to use themselves. BTW, if you're hacking the build system, would you mind adding a --with-pgsql= option to configure? The current code you wrote relies on pg_config being in the path which it certainly isn't on many of my systems. I don't object to that being the default behaviour, but it would be handy to override it when necessary. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: