Re: Next development steps?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ludek Finstrle [mailto:luf@pzkagis.cz]
> Sent: 16 December 2005 12:51
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Next development steps?
>
> > > In my opinion, we should look for the possibility of reworking the
> > > CC_mapping function (which maps PGresult class to QResultClass) to
> > > increase the performance. As Ludek pointed out, we must
> identify the
> > > code to be cleaned up in different parts of the driver.
> >
> > Yes, I'd was thinking about this whilst driving home last night. It
> > seems to me that we should be able to make the PGresult a
> member of the
> > QResultClass, and then just modify the accessors appropriately. Of
> > course, it's not quite that simple, but I think it's doable.
>
> Yes, I was thinking about this. And it need some brainstorm ...
> When you use declare/fetch there can be more PGresults or
> what about type conversion (you can take data number of time)
> and so on.

Yep, both valid points.

> But I'm unable to orient in code becouse a lot of them is unusable
> (I think PQprepare, PQexec with binding params can reduce the
> code a lot).

OK.

> I call for cleaning the code (even at the expense of some feture lost)
> at first.

I'm not against the idea in principle, but I think we need to discuss
each feature proposed for removal beforehand.

Regards, Dave