Re: Schema bug
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Schema bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E96D@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Schema bug (Guillaume LELARGE <gleu@wanadoo.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: Schema bug
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de] > Sent: 14 December 2005 10:27 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Guillaume LELARGE; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Schema bug > > > I don't have a problem with that. Anyone else? > > I *do* have a problem if information_schema becomes non-system. For > pgsql-core this is non-system, but a user would consider this > system and > like to have its display suppressed for day-to-day work. Yeah, well, apart from that bit. > I'm still not convinced we need to do anything. Renaming public is > highly irregular, and finally showing system objects will make it > reappear. The schema restriction allows individual filters > who likes it. Renaming public is irregular, but if we can allow it without breaking anything else, then I see no reason why we shouldn't do it. /D
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: