Re: Schema bug
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Schema bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E946@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Schema bug (Guillaume LELARGE <gleu@wanadoo.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: Schema bug
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of > Guillaume LELARGE > Sent: 13 December 2005 23:44 > To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Schema bug > > Le Mardi 13 Décembre 2005 00:48, Guillaume LELARGE a écrit : > > Le Samedi 10 Décembre 2005 16:55, Andreas Pflug a écrit : > > > Dave Page wrote: > > > >>I still think this patch should be applied. > > > > > > > > Does anyone see a reason /not/ to do this? > > > > > > Hm, Guillaume started a thread on pgsql-hackers about > renaming system > > > schemas in general, maybe we should wait for the result of that > > > discussion. > > > > Well, it seems that pg_* schemas are system schemas and > that public and > > information_schema schemas are public one. I think we > should exclude system > > schemas depending on their names and show public and > information_schema, > > whatever their actual name are. > > > > I can bring a new patch if you agree with this and if you > find this useful. > > What about this one ? I don't have a problem with that. Anyone else? /D
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: