Re: Broken? http://www.postgresql.org/about/
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Broken? http://www.postgresql.org/about/ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E10C@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Broken? http://www.postgresql.org/about/ (gevik@xs4all.nl) |
Список | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net] > Sent: 17 November 2005 16:12 > To: Dave Page > Cc: gevik@xs4all.nl; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Broken? http://www.postgresql.org/about/ > > On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 05:28, Dave Page wrote: > > BTW, how goes the form submission verification? > > > > I heard an interesting twist on this... rather than doing image > verification, you instead reject submissions that come from page that > don't contain a postgresql.org refferrer on the submission page. The > idea being the spam bots post directly to the submission > page, but users > navigate thier way into the page. simple (and transparent to the user) > but apparently very effective for some folks that have > implemented it. Sounds like a good idea, except legitimate clients might not send it (I don't know off-hand if any do offer a way to stop it, but it seems like a sensible privacy option). Also I imagine it would be really easy to add it to the spam bots, so I doubt it'll be long before it stops working for them as well. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: