Re: Windows, ODBC drivers and strange points ...
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Windows, ODBC drivers and strange points ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E0AE@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Windows, ODBC drivers and strange points ... (Marten Feldtmann <m.feldtmann@t-online.de>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Marten Feldtmann > Sent: 16 November 2005 21:41 > To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [ODBC] Windows, ODBC drivers and strange points ... > > Perhaps you might remember my tests with > PostgreSQL and IBm VisualAge Smalltalk. > > I mentioned my problems with column lengths > and stuff like this. > > I still testing (from time to time) with > the 8.0.3 database and use the newest > 8.01.00.03 libpq ODBC drivers and now > the situation is getting worse :-(((( > > IBM Smalltalk is now not able to get the > correct column size for strings any more. > > I always get either 254 bytes or 508 bytes > as column size. > > We have a table like: > > create table "TPERSON" ("ALLCSTVIEW" CHAR(1) > .... > > Now IBM Smalltalk calls OdbcSQLDescribeCol > and gets 254 for this column as size in the > return parameter cbPrecision. > > And the alternate call via OdbcSQLColAttribute > with parameter Sql_Column_Lengthreturns 508. > > Actually this is true for ALL string columns > > The PostgreSQL drivers seem strange for me ... > I've done work with other database systems > via this ODBC library, but PostgreSQL does > not give me any real success .... > > If anyone has any help .... Why are you using such an old development snapshot of the driver? Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: