Re: Registry
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Registry |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7DF91@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Registry (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Registry
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de] > Sent: 11 November 2005 16:29 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Miha Radej; pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Registry > > > Whatever killed mine off didn't delete them, it just set all the > > settings to empty strings so I had lots of servers like: > (:0) as Miha > > did :-( > > 1.5 *does* delete the values, but wx will read a non-existent > value as > empty and recreate it. Because the count value still read 12 or whatever I guess. Do we still need the count in the new scheme? Can't we just iterate through all the subkeys? > > Any suggestions? > We could copy them over, if newer don't exist, and leave the > old ones. > But this would leave quite some (pre-1.5) garbage. I'm not convinced it was actually worth the change - it's not like it was something that the user needed to hack normally, or would cause performance issues. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: