Re: RFC: roles
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFC: roles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC96A4@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RFC: roles (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: RFC: roles
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
[CC'd to Niko as he probably want's to know about this as well] > -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de] > Sent: 01 August 2005 15:15 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] RFC: roles > > I'm thinking different here, because you're using roles and users in > different situations. > When editing roles, you're planning the access scheme layout without > necessarily having certain persons in mind. After the app is > installed, > you won't touch roles any more. > In contrast, adding users and assigning them existing roles is a > day-by-day business. That's why I'd like them separated. Hmmm... What about: Roles - Login - dave - andreas - niko - Organisational (perhaps something shorter?) - support - finance - admin Speaking of which, how does this cope with my user www which is in group www? > (BTW, the icons for Roles/Role are already done, so just use a > > placeholder for now). > > I don't see them in SVN... :-) No, you don't :-) /D
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: