Re: RFC: roles
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFC: roles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC9683@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RFC: roles (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: RFC: roles
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi Andreas > -----Original Message----- > From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of > Andreas Pflug > Sent: 31 July 2005 13:40 > To: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] RFC: roles > > I had a look at roles, and was wondering about the best way > to support them. > > Purely, it's not a problem at all: just expose pg_authid and > pg_auth_members in dialogs/lists. > > OTOH, it might be quite confusing for 1st time users that > there are only > roles with some attributes, no users and groups. Should we have two > modes for it: The reduced view with users and groups (where a > group may > be a group member too) and an enhanced view that allows all > role features? > Additionally, this has also some impact on the security properties, > since a role that may login currently wouldn't be exposed as > grantee by > default. > > Thoughts? I think I would be inclined just to have the full view of everything. Roles effectively deprecate users and groups, so I don't think we should try to fool the user into thinking they are still there. For convenience though, perhaps we should notate which roles have login somehow - perhaps a trailing asterisk? Regards, Dave.
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: