Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC94A6@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | For review: Server instrumentation patch ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us] > Sent: 23 July 2005 20:01 > To: Dave Page > Cc: PostgreSQL-development > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch > > > This patch looks good. The only question I have is why you > didn't want > the pgport rename/unlink calls? We usually use them unless there is > some reason not to. <thinks...> Probably because this was written originally for 7.4 (as a pgAdmin contrib module) and I'm guessing the pgport rename/unlink weren't there at that time. I can't think of any reason not to use them - do you want an updated patch or are you OK to tweak it when applying? Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: