Re: DBSize backend integration
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DBSize backend integration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E490E71B@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | DBSize backend integration ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: DBSize backend integration
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us] > Sent: 24 June 2005 21:07 > To: Dave Page > Cc: PostgreSQL-development > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DBSize backend integration > > > > > > > So drop total_relation_size(), > relation_size_components(), and what > > > else? > > > > indexes_size() > > What is the logic for removing that? Because it is an > aggregate of all > indexes? Yes, and is of limited use in my opinion. I can see a use for pg_relation_size when used on an individual index, but the total of all indexes on a relation seems of little real use to me (and is relatively easily calculated if it really is required for a more specialised purpose). Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: