Re: Proposal for building knowledgebase website.
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal for building knowledgebase website. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E490E424@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Proposal for building knowledgebase website. ("Gevik babakhani" <gevik@xs4all.nl>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com] > Sent: 09 June 2005 23:07 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Proposal for building knowledgebase website. > > Aha, I see the communications difficulty. I see the > easy-to-contribute > interface as the *primary* purpose of a TechDocs without > which it's not > worth bothering. And I have the fear, based on precedent, > that the the > easy-to-use interface will never actually get built. Which > is why I want > to adapt an existing CMS instead of starting from scratch. And my fear (also based on precendent) is that yet-another-site will fall into disrepair as people lose interest in maintaining it (I'm unlikely to get too involved in a different site/architecture for example, and I imagine the same might apply to others such as Magnus - I just don't have the time to commit). My belief is that the easy-to-use interface is far less of a risk given that it's not that complex provided you don't want intricate workflow etc. I'll even go as far as committing myself to writing that /if necessary/, provided we're talking a relatively simple submission/editting form type interface (I don't see much need to register users etc if we're going to moderate everything anyway). I have stated the other benefits of integration with the main site enough times now so I won't repeat them! Anyway, I'm glad we're finally understanding each other, even if we don't necessarily agree on the best solution yet! /D
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: