Re: Proposal for building knowledgebase website.
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal for building knowledgebase website. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E490E391@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Proposal for building knowledgebase website. ("Gevik babakhani" <gevik@xs4all.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal for building knowledgebase website.
Re: Proposal for building knowledgebase website. |
Список | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Gevik Babakhani [mailto:gevik@xs4all.nl] > Sent: 08 June 2005 10:50 > To: Dave Page; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Cc: 'Robert Treat' > Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] Proposal for building knowledgebase website. > > Hi, > > What do you think about the naming of the "new" site. Should > we go on with > "techdocs" or "postgres developer network (pgdn)"? Personally I quite like PostgreSQL Developer Network, but that one is definitely for discussion. > Could you also provide information about the database version that is > preferred (hopefully 8.++) and the PHP modules that is > available at this > moment. I would like to make my development environment same > as the current > configurations of postgres.org. For php, a <? phpinfo(); ?> > should be more > than enough. The box I'm thinking of doesn't have PostgreSQL or PHP installed atm - well, there is a default PHP, but it should be upgraded - currently it is: dpage@postgres:~> php -v PHP 4.3.8 (cli) (built: Oct 6 2004 13:04:29) Copyright (c) 1997-2004 The PHP Group Zend Engine v1.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2004 Zend Technologies dpage@postgres:~> php -m [PHP Modules] openssl overload pcre posix standard tokenizer xml [Zend Modules] It's not currently used however, so can be changed as required. My main concern is that there aren't heaps of dependencies, so building replacement machines is easy if required. > > From our point of view, we will also be interested in > maintenance of the > > site - how do we add/remove/edit HTML docs, how do we > add/remove other > > docs (PDFs etc) and that sort of thing. > > This is an important point of attention. If we want to put > the content > "outside" the database then we would have to index the > content somehow for > searching. To that, if the content is decided to be saved "inside" the > database then we have to discuss the how the resources used > in the content > would we accessed. > > For example: Let's say we have some html content saved inside > the database, > and this page has a coupe of images. Where would these images > be saved? And > how would these be accessed again? In the main site (and the CMS I'm writing ATM at work), files as you describe are stored outside the database under /files or a similar static location. As for indexing for searching, I would suggest not worrying about it - the existing search engine (http://search.postgresql.org) will cover that with suitable templates. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: