Re: Site way slow, please check
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Site way slow, please check |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E452854F@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Site way slow, please check (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Site way slow, please check
|
| Список | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@postgresql.org] > Sent: 19 January 2005 19:42 > To: Magnus Hagander > Cc: fred@redhotpenguin.com; Dave Page; josh@agliodbs.com; > pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Site way slow, please check > > >> For what it's worth (and I'm on the digest list so someone > >> may have already brought this up), bittorrent is fairly > >> resource intensive and perhaps it doesn't need to be run on > >> this particular server. I setup bt seeds for all the > >> torrents on a box I had last night with a 10 megabit line, > >> and I'll do the same with my other production box today. As > >> long as there's at least one torrent seed going out there, I > >> don't think the webserver should be seeding torrents. > > > > There have been several other machines seeding. Only the > trackers are on > > that box. I think. At least there were plenty of other > seeders available > > on different networks. > > As far as I know, this is the case ... I've been watching > that server all > day, and all appears to be running smoothly ... We do seem to have lots of very old versions in there as well though - is there any need for that? I would think that 8.0, 7.4.6 and any other popular downloads (psqlodbc, pgadmin etc) would have been enough? Regards, Dave
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: