Re: BUG: pgIndex.cpp
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG: pgIndex.cpp |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E452835E@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG: pgIndex.cpp (P3 Consulting <p3c@p3-consulting.net>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin@pse-consulting.de] > Sent: 12 January 2005 09:27 > To: Dave Page > Cc: P3 Consulting; pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] BUG: pgIndex.cpp > > Dave Page wrote: > > > Did you get a chance to look at this? It seems to me that > the quick and > > dirty solution is to wrap the index->iSetxxx calls in an > 'if (index)', > > however I'm not entirely convinced that is safe given that > it's possible > > to return a null index pointer to the caller (which without > significant > > trawling through code I may not find all instances of). > > I don't see the point catching this beyond an assert. A sane > pgsql will > never return contype != p, u, or NULL unless system tables > are corrupted. Very true. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: