Re: New ODBC driver
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: New ODBC driver |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4527C0E@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | New ODBC driver (markw@mohawksoft.com) |
| Ответы |
Re: New ODBC driver
|
| Список | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message----- > From: markw@mohawksoft.com [mailto:markw@mohawksoft.com] > Sent: 01 December 2004 15:02 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [ODBC] New ODBC driver > > > I don't think it would be realistic to mix the two > approaches though - > > if only because they couldn't share a single database connection. > > Why is this an issue? Why not create multiple connections? Efficiency for a start - but what would you use each for? Any application developer is going to expect everything to use the same connection - how do you direct a 'SET' statement? What about transaction isolation? Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: