Re: Going for Gold
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Going for Gold |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4527B98@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Going for Gold (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Going for Gold
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of > Andreas Pflug > Sent: 29 November 2004 10:24 > To: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Going for Gold > > Hi friends, > > seems pgAdmin III 1.2RC is matured, should we make it Gold > now? Tom Lane promised to avoid further changes to the pgsql > system schema, so hopefully we won't face similar problems as > with beta4->beta5 again. > > As soon as pgsql8.0 is out, we can roll 1.2.1 to update the > documentation to the release version, but we shouldn't delay > 1.2.0 for it. Sounds good to me. Are the docs/screenshots/pg docs etc up to date? I can probably roll it tomorrow.... (following which I'll branch for -patches) /D
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: