Re: Foreign keys / MATCH FULL, PARTIAL, etc.
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Foreign keys / MATCH FULL, PARTIAL, etc. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306A6B@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Foreign keys / MATCH FULL, PARTIAL, etc. (Alexander Borkowski <alexander.borkowski@abri.une.edu.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Foreign keys / MATCH FULL, PARTIAL, etc.
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of > Alexander Borkowski > Sent: 11 October 2004 08:31 > To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Foreign keys / MATCH FULL, PARTIAL, etc. > > I don't know of how much help this is going to be, but the > anwer to the question > > // MATCH FULL/PARTIAL missing; where is this stored?!? > > posed in pgForeignKey.cpp line 45 is: In > pg_catalog.pg_trigger.tgargs. > It is the third argument (zero based) to the ri-triggers, or > more precisely the RI_MATCH_TYPE_ARGNO'th, cf. > include/commands/trigger.h in the PostgreSQL 8.0 beta 3 > source (7.4 as well). Ahh, thanks Alex. Iirc, that comment was written in 7.3 days when the dcos said something like "There's MATCH FULL and MATCH PARTIAL which isn't implemented yet", so it was probably ignored. Of course, there was also MATCH SIMPLE, but it didn't have a name then, and cursory scan of the docs probably wouldn't have registered it's existance :-( I'll add a note to the todo. Thanks, Dave.
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: