Re: postmaster.pid
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postmaster.pid |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E41A7867@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew@dunslane.net] > Sent: 24 August 2004 15:06 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Barry Lind; pgsql-hackers-win32@postgresql.org; Max Dunn > Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid > > > > I think we're on the wrong track here. If there is a pid file > then the postmaster will try to see if the process is running > by calling > kill(pid,0) - see backend/utils/init/miscinit.c. > > However, on Windows we simulate kill(), and always return > EINVAL if the signal <= 0 (see port/kill.c). ISTM the correct > solution would be to implement the effect of kill(pid,0) in > port/kill.c, presumably by a call to some native Windows > function that gives you the process info for a given pid. Hi Andrew, I'm glad you spotted that - I was just about to submit a patch that used kill(pid, 0)!! My code is now submitted in a slightly different form which will hopefully help sort this problem, however I have an hour or so now so I'll take a quick look at the kill() issue. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: