Re: PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list?
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E41A76CB@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list?
Re: PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list? |
Список | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com] > Sent: 11 August 2004 17:04 > To: Dave Page; PostgreSQL www > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PGSQL-WINDOWS mailing list? > > Dave, > > > Are you really expecting that many platform specific > questions? With a > > separate list I can already see the confusion as users get bounced > > onto another list because their question is slightly more of a > > platform issue, or actually an SQL issue. > > So far, I'm seeing a lot of them. This could me because the > Win port is > still buggy, of course, but it might continue. I'm seeing quite a few, but they are pretty much all installer and a few initdb issues, all of which we will hopefully iron out. I'm not on -general or -novice though, so I may be missing a whole heap of traffic that you're not. > Also, I *am* expecting the windows port to expand out active > online community by at least 1000 subscribers, if not 5 times > that. My experience with other projects (like > OpenOffice.org) showed that when a mailing list gets too big > (somewhere between 60 and 100 posts a day) it becomes > prohibitive for the > entry-level user as a support mechanism. Some people have > yahoo accounts, > you know? That's a different issue altogether though (perfectly valid though). Is there a more appropriate way to split the existing groups perhaps? I'm opposed to shifting the windows users onto a platform specific group just because there's a lot of them. I'm not opposed to shifting them if we find there are lots of platform specific problems though. > > So it's as much wanting to have another list of any kind as > having a windows-specific list. Yup :-) Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: