Re: unixODBC vs. iODBC
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unixODBC vs. iODBC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40C392C@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | unixODBC vs. iODBC (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut > Sent: 09 July 2004 19:57 > To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > Subject: [ODBC] unixODBC vs. iODBC > > Now that we have removed that "neither unixODBC nor iODBC" > version of the Unix variant of the driver, you get > uncontrolled breakage when you just run "./configure; make; > make install". I think it would be beneficial to add > automatic detection of the available driver manager. > That is: > > - if --with-unixodbc is specified, use unixODBC > > - if --with-iodbc is specified, use iODBC > > - if both are specified, abort > > - if neither is specified, search for unixODBC, then iODBC (I > think that is the order of popularity; tell me if I'm wrong). > If neither is found, abort. > > Comments? Sounds perfectly sensible to me. Although not a user myself, my sense from posts on the lists is also that unixODBC is the most popular. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: