Re: 64 Bit patch (WAS: psqlodbc developer)
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 64 Bit patch (WAS: psqlodbc developer) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40C3828@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 64 Bit patch (WAS: psqlodbc developer) ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: 64 Bit patch (WAS: psqlodbc developer)
|
Список | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] > Sent: 02 July 2004 10:06 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [ODBC] 64 Bit patch (WAS: psqlodbc developer) > > Am Freitag, 2. Juli 2004 10:45 schrieben Sie: > > I've forwarded this patch to the list for review before > it's applied > > (I don't use IODBC). > > If one uses iODBC then the include files are picked up from > the installed version of iODBC. The files iodbc.h, isql.h, > etc. in the source tree are sort of obsolete. They are only > used for the "neither unixODBC nor iODBC" > version of the driver, which is quite useless. In which case, should they be removed to force the user to install either iODBC or unixODBC first? Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: