Re: Thesis on PostgreSQL
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Thesis on PostgreSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E407B3F5@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Thesis on PostgreSQL (Eyinagho Newton <neyinagho@yahoo.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----Original Message----- From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org on behalf of D'Arcy J.M. Cain Sent: Sat 9/4/2004 2:24 PM To: Jim C. Nasby Cc: peter_e@gmx.net; neyinagho@yahoo.com; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Thesis on PostgreSQL > The only "generation" differentiation I have ever heard about in general > use was based on the language used to talk to the database. In that > sense PostgreSQL is 3GL (SQL) and plpgsql might be 4GL. Progress is a > 4GL. I'm not sure that's a feature though. First week of a database module I did at Uni some years back discussed generations of database along the lines of: File systems/flat storage Hierarchical databases (IMS) Network databases(CODASYL) Relational Databases (RDBMS) Object Relational Databases (ORDBMS) Which of course puts us as the latest generation. Dunno about Oracle... Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: