Re: psqlODBC LGPL Licence
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psqlODBC LGPL Licence |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E407B390@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | psqlODBC LGPL Licence ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psqlODBC LGPL Licence
|
| Список | pgsql-odbc |
-----Original Message----- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] Sent: Mon 7/19/2004 8:17 PM To: Dave Page; pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [ODBC] psqlODBC LGPL Licence > As long as you are describing the authorship, both should be listed, as > is done in notice.txt. Yeah, I'm not suggesting we remove them from the licence/credits etc, but rather the version resource for the Windows DLL.If you look at the list of drivers in the ODBC driver manager, it's that name you see as the supplier of the driver.It's been that long since they've been involved that I think it would be better to see PGDG there as the primary distributor. Regards, Dave
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: