Re: Again about translation
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Again about translation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40154CB41@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Again about translation ("Milen A. Radev" <milen@radev.net>) |
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of > Milen A. Radev > Sent: 08 September 2006 17:30 > To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Again about translation > > Dave Page написа: > [...] > > >>>> 3. > >>>> What is the difference from "dependencies" and > >> "dependees"? I couldn't > >>>> find the latter on any dictionary. Is it a synonym of > >> "dependents"? > >>> Yes. Thinking about it, dependees is probably not > >> technically an English > >>> word, but people know what it means and changing it now > >> would probably > >>> be painful. > >> Ok, but unfortunatly I don't know what it means. Could you please > >> explain it to me? > > > > Objects that are dependent on the one currently being viewed. > > And those are "dependants" (or "dependents") - see > http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=dependant, > http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=dependent and > http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=20822&dict=CALD Yes, 'dependee' is fairly widely used as well as a quick google will show, but I think dependent is more correct. I'm correctingthis now and will re-merge the strings. Thanks for the freedback. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: