Re: SUN Studio 11 vs pgAdmin - code cleanup]

Hi,

Yes, I did get it, I just haven't caught up since my vacation yet.
Hopefully later today or tomorrow :-)

Thanks, Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM [mailto:Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM]
> Sent: 21 August 2006 12:36
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: SUN Studio 11 vs pgAdmin - code cleanup]
>
> Dave Page napsal(a):
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM [mailto:Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM]
> >> Sent: 02 August 2006 07:33
> >> To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org; Dave Page
> >> Subject: SUN Studio 11 vs pgAdmin - code cleanup]
> >>
> >>
> >> I tried compiled pgAdmin with the SUN Studio 11 and I found
> >> some problem
> >> in the code. I send patch which fix two errors and lot of warnings:
> >>
> >> 1) New C++ standard brings overloaded definition of strchr
> >> function. See
> >>    http://www.cplusplus.com/ref/cstring/strchr.html for detail.
> >>
> >> 2) Missing const in the pgCollection::FindChild method definition
> >> generate mangling problem with linking. See
> >> http://developers.sun.com/prodtech/cc/documentation/ss11/mr/RE
> >> ADMEs/c++.html#cNameMangling
> >>
> >> 3) I removed extra ; in the code on many places.
> >
> > Thanks - patch applied to the stable branch. Would you mind
> taking some
> > time to port the patch to SVN TRUNK please? It's most
> likely that that
> > will go beta within a few weeks and unfortunately I'm
> *really* pushed
> > for time right now :-(
>
> There is patch for the TRUNK.
>
>
>     Zdenek
>
> PS: I sent this mail on Friday, but It was not appear in the list. Is
> everything OK with the mailing list?
>
>