Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388BA5@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL (Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:devrim@commandprompt.com] > Sent: 26 June 2006 15:03 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Robert Treat; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Andrew > Dunstan; Tom Lane > Subject: Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: > [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL > > > Ok, I talked with them now. They need the following information: > > - What type of hardware do we need? Is an Opteron enough? > Memory? Disk? Depends what it was used for. > - Do we need a private box, or is a VM enough? As above. > - What is the average traffic of our web servers? Dunno, but not a huge figure - the network is heavily specc'ed towards high availability and coping with a good /.ing. Individual servers tend to be very lightly loaded. > Bandwith is not cheap in Turkey, so they are inclined to put > that server > somewhere outside Turkey. > > They are ready to proceed, they just want to learn the details. Well I think Robert is suggesting we setup a box with a bunch of VM's running different OS's as buildfarm clients. I don't know how useful that would be, but at the least, with VMWare (or Bochs if it's mature enough now) and a Windows licence it could run nightly builds of Mingw and Cygwin, and with just VMWare it could do Solaris x86, and an assortment of Linuxes and *BSDs. Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: