Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388954@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Which processor runs better for Postgresql? (Steve Poe <steve.poe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:smarlowe@g2switchworks.com]
Sent: 14 June 2006 18:04
To: Dave Page
Cc: Joshua D. Drake; steve.poe@gmail.com; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [PERFORM] Which processor runs better for Postgresql?On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 15:11, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> And how old are the 2600's now?
>
> Anyhoo, I'm not saying the current machines are excellent performers or
> anything, but there are good business reasons to run them if you don't
> need to squeeze out every last pony.
Just thought I'd point you to Dell's forums.
http://forums.us.dell.com/supportforums/board?board.id=pes_linux&page=1
wherein you'll find plenty of folks who have problems with freezing RAID
controllers with 28xx and 18xx machines.
<shrug>Never had any such problems in the dozen or so machines we run (about a 50-50 split of Linux to Windows).
Regards, Dave
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: