Re: Best high availability solution ?
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Best high availability solution ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4013885CD@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Best high availability solution ? (Arnaud Lesauvage <thewild@freesurf.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: Best high availability solution ?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Arnaud Lesauvage [mailto:thewild@freesurf.fr] > Sent: 31 May 2006 12:33 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Tino Wildenhain; pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Best high availability solution ? > > Dave Page a écrit : > > Yes - the DNS method would work, but you might run into > caching issues > > requiring the users to reboot or do a 'ipconfig /flushdns' > before they > > see the change. > > Yes, but I am not a very nice adminsitrator, and when there is any > problem with a datawase, my users HAVE to reboot ! ;-) > So that might just be fine ! Ah, but wasn't this intended for when you are not there standing over them with a bat? :-) Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: