Re: Best high availability solution ?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnaud Lesauvage [mailto:thewild@freesurf.fr]
> Sent: 31 May 2006 11:27
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Best high availability solution ?
>
> Dave Page a écrit :
> > Slony-I only exists for Windows in a not-even-beta state at
> the moment,
> > so even if you get things up and running using a virtual IP
> solution you
> > will be hand-holding Slony until it gets properly released.
>
> OK, I thought it was in production stage.

The code is written, and is good as far as we are aware, but has not been through a beta/release cycle yet.

> Is there a simple replication solution for windows then ? Or will
> I have to stop the master postgresql at night to pgdump and
> pgrestore on the backup server ?

You don't need to stop the master server to pg_dump (in fact, it won't work if you do). On the slave, you can just drop
theDBs and pg_restore them. 

PITR is another solution you might consider.

> If I have a synchronized backup server (even if it synchronizes
> once or twice a day, this might be OK), I could just write a
> simple script that would change the host file of the clients to
> have the postgresql's name to point to the backup IP...

Might be better if the users know they are being switched over - that way they will know to check for lost transactions
etc.If you're using an ODBC app, consider using a separate DSN for the live and backup servers - similar solutions
wouldapply to other interfaces of course. 

Regards, Dave