Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C9BC0@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module (lmyho <lm_yho@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Alban Hertroys [mailto:alban@magproductions.nl] > Sent: 11 April 2006 10:45 > To: Dave Page > Cc: tyler@yi.org; chris@verkiel.metatrontech.com; > tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us; chris@travelamericas.com; > smarlowe@g2switchworks.com; doug@mcnaught.org; > lm_yho@yahoo.com; pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Debian package for freeradius_postgresql module > > > The only proper fix for this licensing issue IMHO is to fix > GPL, not to kludge in some GPL compliant library. The issue > at hand obviously is licensing related, the software is not > the problem. And the cause of the licensing problem is > apparently a restriction in GPL. Fix that, problem solved. I was having similar thoughts but restrained from airing them for fear of starting a flamewar. I do find it somewhat ironic that some people seem to be being forced into using GNU software to resolve these issues that almost scream 'vendor lockin' and similar phrases normally aimed at Microsoft et al. by GNU/FSF proponents! Regards, Dave
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: